Volvo S80 2013 vs Volvo S60 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S80 engine produces 9 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S80 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S80 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1550 km in combined cycle | 1550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1750 km on highway | 1810 km on highway | ||
| 1250 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 151 mm (5.9 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S80 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S80 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volvo S80 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S80 has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |