Volvo S80 2000 vs Audi A6 1998

 
Volvo S80
2000 - 2003
Audi A6
1998 - 2001
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP125 HP
Torque: 240 NM168 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds11.8 seconds
Volvo S80 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S80 engine produces 55 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Volvo S80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.6
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S80 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S80 could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S80 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1070 km on highway
720 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.80 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
Volvo S80 is larger, but lower.
Volvo S80 is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1126 litresno data
Volvo S80 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6.
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`995
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Volvo S80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S80, so Volvo S80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.6/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Audi A6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv