Volvo S80 2011 vs Volvo XC70 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S80
2011 - 2013
Volvo XC70
2013 - 2016
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 3.22.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 304 HP163 - 304 HP
Torque: 240 - 440 NM350 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 - 11.5 seconds6.8 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 9.94.5 - 10.6
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, a Volvo S80 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo XC70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.84 m
Width: 1.86 m1.86 m
Height: 1.49 m1.60 m
Volvo S80 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S80 is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1600 litres
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70.
Gross weight: ~ 2`178 kg~ 2`360 kg
Net weight:~ 1`631 kg~ 1`930 kg
Load capacity:~ 547 kg~ 430 kg
Volvo S80 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volvo XC70. Therefore, Volvo S80 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 580011 200
Pros and Cons: Volvo S80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo XC70 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv