Volvo S80 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo S80 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S80 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 285 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 - 420 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 11.3 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Volvo S80 petrol engines consumes on average 6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Volvo S80 equipped with diesel engines consume 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Volvo S80 is larger, but lower. Volvo S80 is 24 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S80 is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S80 has 624 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Volvo S80 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S80 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`168 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S80 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |