Volvo S60 2013 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 130 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 194 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo S60 and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 170 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Megane has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Renault Megane quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |