Volvo S60 2013 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 22 HP more power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 224 NM more than Chevrolet Cruze. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is larger. Volvo S60 is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Cruze, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze. This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Cruze, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 1`793 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |