Volvo S60 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW 3 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1630 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 3 sērija 2015: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo S60 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |