Volvo S60 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2012

 
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP116 HP
Torque: 400 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds11.3 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 47 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1390 km in combined cycle1290 km in combined cycle
1630 km on highway1290 km on highway
940 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Ground clearance: 136 mm (5.4 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.62 m
Width: 1.87 m1.81 m
Height: 1.48 m1.43 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1749 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1101`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 60012 000
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv