Volvo S60 2013 vs BMW 3 series 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 47 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
1630 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S60 is larger. Volvo S60 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |