Volvo S60 2013 vs Volvo V60 2013

 
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds9.6 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.0
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1330 km on highway
Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1749 litresno data
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0202`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 12 60014 200
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv