Volvo S60 2013 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 24 HP more power than Mercedes C class, but torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes C class. Despite the higher power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo V40, Volvo V60 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase, Mercedes CLA | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Volvo S60 is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.22 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.08 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 26 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |