Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo V40 2012

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 180 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds8.5 seconds
Volvo S60 and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1230 km on highway1140 km on highway
830 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.37 m
Width: 1.87 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 is 26 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres335 litres
Volvo S60 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo S60 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`920
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 74008200
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv