Volvo S60 2010 vs Audi A3 2008

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP102 HP
Torque: 240 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 78 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway1010 km on highway
940 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.29 m
Width: 1.87 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 is 34 cm longer than the Audi A3, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1104 litres
Volvo S60 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0201`785
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 60005600
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Audi A3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv