Volvo S60 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 65 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Volvo S60 has 4x4: It has Haldex Generation IV automatic proactive all-wheel drive. Haldex analyzes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-plate clutch for faster activation when needed. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a max 50/50 torque split. | |||
| Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo S60 is 17 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 152 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |