Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo S60 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 2010 engine produces 75 HP more power than Volvo S60 2004, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Volvo S60 2004. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
| Volvo S60 2010 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2004, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1650 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Volvo S60 2010 is larger. Volvo S60 2010 is 5 cm longer than the Volvo S60 2004, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1034 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S60 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 2010 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S60 2004. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`571 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 519 kg | 430 kg | |
| Volvo S60 2010 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Volvo S60 2004. Therefore, Volvo S60 2010 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |