Volvo S60 2010 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 61 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 252 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo S60 is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |