Volvo S60 2010 vs Jaguar XF 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 112 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo S60 is 33 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.18 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |