Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo S60 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volvo S60 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 2010 engine produces 23 HP more power than Volvo S60 2004, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo S60 2004. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.0 | |
The Volvo S60 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 2010 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2004, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo S60 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S60 2010 is larger. Volvo S60 2010 is 5 cm longer than the Volvo S60 2004, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Volvo S60 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 2010 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60 2004. This could mean that the Volvo S60 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 2010 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S60 2004. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |