Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo V60 2011

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Volvo V60
2011 - 2013
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP240 HP
Torque: 300 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds7.7 seconds
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S60 engine produces 37 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.3
Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres430 litres
Volvo V60 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0602`130
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 74006800
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V60 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv