Volvo S60 2004 vs Volkswagen Jetta 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 54 HP more power than Volkswagen Jetta, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Volkswagen Jetta. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volvo S60 2004 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo S60 2004 2.4 engine Volkswagen Jetta 2006 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Jetta 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Jetta, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1034 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Jetta has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 has 103 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Jetta. This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volkswagen Jetta has
| |