Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo 850 1996

 
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Volvo 850
1996 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP250 HP
Torque: 330 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds6.7 seconds
Volvo S60 and Volvo 850 have the same engine power, but Volvo S60 torque is 20 NM less than Volvo 850. Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.310.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
690 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.67 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volvo S60 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres445 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Volvo 850 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 850.
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`910
Safety: no data
Quality:Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Volvo 850 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv