Volvo S60 2000 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol1.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP117 HP
Torque: 330 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds11.3 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 133 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.37.7
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1160 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volvo S60 is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Volvo S60 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`010no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv