Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo S60 2005

	Volvo S60 2000 - 2003	Volvo S60 2005 - 2009
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.4 Petrol	2.4 Petrol
Performance
Power:	200 HP	260 HP
Torque:	285 NM	350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8 seconds	6.9 seconds
	Volvo S60 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 2000 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo S60 2005, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo S60 2005. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	10.0	9.8
	Volvo S60 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	700 km in combined cycle	710 km in combined cycle
	940 km on highway	950 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.58 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.80 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.43 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 2000 and Volvo S60 2005 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	424 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1034 litres	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	12 meters	no data
Gross weight (kg):	2`030	2`025

Safety:		no data
Quality:	Volvo S60 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 2000 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo S60 2005, so Volvo S60 2005 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1400	2800
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.5/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S60 has lower price	Volvo S60 has more power more dynamic fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo S60 2005

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions