Volvo S60 2002 vs SAAB 9-5 2002

 
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
SAAB 9-5
2002 - 2005
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP120 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.9 seconds
Volvo S60 engine produces 10 HP more power than SAAB 9-5, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.9
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1380 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.83 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.50 m
Volvo S60 is 25 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 424 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`800
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
SAAB 9-5 has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv