Volvo S60 2002 vs Volvo S80 2000

 
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Volvo S80
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP200 HP
Torque: 192 NM285 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds7.9 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S60 engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.3
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1110 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.82 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo S60 is smaller.
Volvo S60 is 24 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litres1126 litres
Volvo S60 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 92 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0202`050
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.6/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv