Volvo S60 2002 vs Volvo 850 1994

 
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Volvo 850
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP144 HP
Torque: 192 NM206 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.2 seconds
Volvo 850 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo S60 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo 850, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volvo 850. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 850.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres73 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
800 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.67 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volvo S60 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Volvo 850 has more luggage space.
Volvo S60 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 850.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0201`840
Safety: no data
Quality:Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Volvo 850 has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv