Volvo S60 2003 vs Peugeot 406 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 37 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.5 | |
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
Volvo S60 is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1034 litres | no data | |
Volvo S60 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Volvo S60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |