Volvo S60 2003 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP143 HP
Torque: 240 NM192 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9.9 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 37 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.27.5
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1160 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volvo S60 is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Volvo S60 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 406.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Volvo S60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`880
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv