Volvo S60 2003 vs SAAB 9-5 2001

 
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds12.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S60 engine produces 30 HP more power than SAAB 9-5, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.010.6
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway880 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.83 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.50 m
Volvo S60 is 25 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 424 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`800
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 14001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
SAAB 9-5 has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv