Volvo S60 2015 vs Volvo V60 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 215 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine: Engines in this series are often associated with oil consumption issues, which many owners report over time.
In the initial production years, a common weakness was the coolant reservoir hose, which had a ... More about Volvo V60 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S60 and Volvo V60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1749 litres | 1241 litres | |
| Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 508 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Volvo S60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`534 kg | 1`796 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 526 kg | 474 kg | |
| Volvo S60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Volvo V60. Therefore, Volvo S60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |