Volvo S60 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is smaller. Volvo S60 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S60 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Volvo S60 has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Volvo XC60 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo S60, so Volvo XC60 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |