Volvo S60 2015 vs Citroen C4 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Volvo S60 engine produces 16 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S60 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.80 m | |
Volvo S60 is larger, but lower. Volvo S60 is 4 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 32 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 443 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |