Volvo S60 2015 vs Volvo V60 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 105 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1590 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1710 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo V60 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1749 litres | 1241 litres | |
| Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 508 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Volvo S60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`060 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`656 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 544 kg | |
| Volvo S60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Volvo V60. Therefore, Volvo V60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |