Volvo S60 2013 vs Volvo V40 2012
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 181 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 31 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1590 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Volvo S60 is larger. Volvo S60 is 26 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 10 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
Volvo S60 has more luggage capacity. Volvo S60 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |