Volvo S60 2015 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mercedes C class, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1710 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
1860 km on highway | 1590 km on highway | ||
1170 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mercedes C klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.22 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.08 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`115 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 26 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |