Volvo S60 2015 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo S60 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1550 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1810 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Volvo V60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volvo S60 2015 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo S60 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |