Volvo S60 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Volvo S60 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo S60 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Volvo S60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1740 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 1230 km with real consumption | 1140 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo S60 is 17 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 152 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |