Volvo S60 2018 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 405 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Volvo S60 engine produces 260 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 217 NM more than Mazda 6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Volvo S60 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volvo S60 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |