Volvo S60 2018 vs Mazda 6 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 320 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 213 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S60 engine produces 175 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 187 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo S60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Volvo S60 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Volvo S60 is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 489 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`935 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 30 800 | 23 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |