Volvo S60 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 440 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 - 12.3 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 9.9 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 - 136 mm (4.9 - 5.4 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo S60 is smaller. Volvo S60 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S60 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1749 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Volvo S60 has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`087 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |