Volvo S60 2010 vs Volvo S60 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 126 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 440 NM | 192 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.9 seconds | 5.7 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 9.9 | 6.4 - 13.0 | |
Volvo S60 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60 2004. On average, Volvo S60 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo S60 2010 is larger. Volvo S60 2010 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo S60 2004, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 2010 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Volvo S60 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 2010 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60 2004. This could mean that the Volvo S60 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 2010 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S60 2004, which means Volvo S60 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`089 | ~ 2`031 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |