Volvo S60 2010 vs Audi A3 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.2 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 115 - 304 HP90 - 250 HP
Torque: 240 - 440 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 10.9 seconds6.2 - 13.3 seconds
In general, Volvo S60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi A3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 9.94.2 - 9.4
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.29 m
Width: 1.87 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 is 34 cm longer than the Audi A3, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1120 litres
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`089 kg~ 1`916 kg
Net weight:~ 1`592 kg~ 1`356 kg
Load capacity:~ 497 kg~ 560 kg
Volvo S60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 58005600
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv