Volvo S60 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 140 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 440 NM | 200 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.9 seconds | 5.6 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 9.9 | 5.8 - 10.1 | |
|
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat CC. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo S60 is 17 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 152 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`089 | ~ 1`981 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S60 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |