Volvo S60 2004 vs Mercedes C class 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Mercedes C class
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S60 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.8 - 5.4

Performance

Power: 126 - 300 HP122 - 367 HP
Torque: 192 - 400 NM220 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.7 - 12 seconds5.2 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 13.06.1 - 11.9
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.53 m
Width: 1.80 m1.73 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1034 litresno data
Mercedes C class has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo S60 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 13 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 2.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`031~ 1`629
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 32003200
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv