Volvo S60 2004 vs Mercedes C class 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Mercedes C class
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo S60 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.8 - 5.4

Performance

Power: 126 - 300 HP122 - 367 HP
Torque: 192 - 400 NM220 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.7 - 12 seconds5.2 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 13.06.1 - 11.9
Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.53 m
Width: 1.80 m1.73 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo S60 is larger.
Volvo S60 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1034 litresno data
Mercedes C class has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo S60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 13 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 2.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`031 kg~ 2`041 kg
Net weight:~ 1`543 kg~ 1`488 kg
Load capacity:~ 488 kg~ 553 kg
Volvo S60 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mercedes C class. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 24002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S60 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv