Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo V70 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Volvo S60 2000 - 2004	Volvo V70 2000 - 2004
Body:	Sedan	Estate car / wagon
	The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	2.0 - 2.5	2.3 - 2.5
Performance
Power:	130 - 300 HP	140 - 300 HP
Torque:	192 - 400 NM	192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	5.7 - 12 seconds	5.9 - 11.9 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.5 - 13.0	6.5 - 13.6
	Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Volvo S60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.58 m	4.71 m
Width:	1.80 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.49 m
	Volvo S60 is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo S60 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	424 litres	485 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1034 litres	1641 litres
	Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 607 litres).
Turning diameter:	13 meters	13.2 meters
	The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`030	~ 2`123

Safety:		no data
Quality:	above average	below average
Average price (€):	1600	1600
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.1/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption fewer faults	Volvo V70 has roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo V70 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions