Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo S70 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Volvo S60 2000 - 2004	Volvo S70 1996 - 2000
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	2.0 - 2.5	2.0 - 2.5
Performance
Power:	130 - 300 HP	126 - 250 HP
Torque:	192 - 400 NM	170 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	5.7 - 12 seconds	6.7 - 12.1 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.5 - 13.0	6.3 - 11.7
	Volvo S60 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S70. On average, a Volvo S60 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo S70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.58 m	4.72 m
Width:	1.80 m	1.76 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.39 m
	Volvo S60 is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo S70, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo S60 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	424 litres	470 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1034 litres	no data
	Volvo S70 has more luggage space. Volvo S60 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S70.
Turning diameter:	13 meters	11.3 meters
	The turning circle of the Volvo S60 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S70, which means Volvo S60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`030	~ 1`732

Safety:
Quality:	above average	below average
Average price (€):	1400	1200
Rating in user reviews:	8.0/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption fewer faults	Volvo S70 has roomier boot better manoeuvrability lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S60 2000 vs Volvo S70 1996

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions