Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Volvo S40
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.9 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 200 HP140 HP
Torque: 300 NM183 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S40 2000 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 2000 engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo S40 1996, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Volvo S40 1996. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.59.3
Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway840 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 1996 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Volvo V40Used also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Volvo S40 1996 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2000 and Volvo S40 1996 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres853 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`720
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 800600
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 7.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volvo S40 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv