Volvo S40 2000 vs Audi A3 2000

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Audi A3
2000 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP125 HP
Torque: 300 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 75 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.27.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S40 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway880 km on highway
660 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.15 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is 33 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1110 litres
Volvo S40 has 121 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 257 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`720
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv