Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996

	Volvo S40 2000 - 2002	Volvo S40 1996 - 1999
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	1.9 Petrol	1.9 Petrol
Performance
Power:	165 HP	140 HP
Torque:	240 NM	183 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.5 seconds	9.7 seconds
	Volvo S40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 2000 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo S40 1996, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Volvo S40 1996. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.3	9.0
	The Volvo S40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	60 litres	60 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	720 km in combined cycle	660 km in combined cycle
	960 km on highway	880 km on highway
	Volvo S40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.48 m	4.48 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.72 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.41 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2000 and Volvo S40 1996 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	471 litres	471 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	853 litres	853 litres
Turning diameter:	11 meters	11 meters
Gross weight (kg):	1`780	1`720

Safety:	no data
Quality:	below average	below average
Average price (€):	800	600
Rating in user reviews:	7.0/10	7.1/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo S40 has more power more dynamic lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage	Volvo S40 has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions