Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo S40 2000 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo S40 1996, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Volvo S40 1996. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
|
The Volvo S40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2000 and Volvo S40 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`310 kg | 1`288 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 432 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |
