Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S40 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 183 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Volvo S40 2000 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo S40 1996, but torque is 7 NM more than Volvo S40 1996. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
The Volvo S40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo S40 2000 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40 1996, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Volvo S40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo S40 2000 and Volvo S40 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
853 litres | 853 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo S40 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |