Volvo S40 2000 vs Audi A3 2000

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Audi A3
2000 - 2001
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 265 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds12.4 seconds
Volvo S40 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo S40 engine produces 25 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Volvo S40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.44.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo S40 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo S40 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo S40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1340 km on highway
1110 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.15 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is 33 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1100 litres
Volvo S40 has 121 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 247 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo S40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`745
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv