Volvo S40 2000 vs Volvo S60 2002

 
Volvo S40
2000 - 2002
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 102 HP130 HP
Torque: 215 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 engine produces 28 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo S60.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.5
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo S40 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volvo S40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1370 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.58 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Volvo S40 is smaller.
Volvo S40 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo S40 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
853 litres1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo S40 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7702`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 6.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv